Republicans lose their leadership positions in Minnesota

I used to be Republican and now swing between Moderate and Democrat — but after seeing the immature response from Minnesota Republican elected officials when their colleagues voted to override the governor’s veto, I don’t think I can go back to being a Republican.

The Republican leader of the Minnesota House said today the six Republicans who voted to override Governor Pawlenty’s veto of a transportation bill have been removed from their leadership positions.
Source: MPR.org

The fact of the matter is that Minnesota’s roads, highways, bridges, and mass transportation are lacking — and if we can’t agree to fund something that fundamental to our infrastructure, then those Republicans who voted in favor of the governor’s wishes should be the ones removed of their leadership positions.

Frankly, I see this as an empty, immature, and irrational response to not getting their way. If you don’t get your way with your colleagues, punish them by stripping them of leadership. That’ll show ‘em.

This is exactly why American wants change in our political system. The inbred fighting amongst both Republicans and Democrats is OLD. We’re tired of the lobbyists running the show behind the scenes. The pork barrel spending is out of control for pet projects.

It’s time we saw more change (for the better) around here.

Digg This
February 26, 2008, 3:51 pm

Go away James Dobson. America doesn’t want you here anymore.

Okay, saw my friend wezlo just post something on Dobson; and I just had to repost it here, too.

This James Dobson quote is from a Reuters Article:

“I am convinced Sen. McCain is not a conservative, and in fact, has gone out of his way to stick his thumb in the eyes of those who are … I cannot, and will not, vote for Sen. John McCain, as a matter of conscience,” he said in a statement on Tuesday.

Later on he says:

I believe this general election will offer the worst choices for president in my lifetime. I certainly can’t vote for Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama based on their virulently anti-family policy positions. If these are the nominees in November, I simply will not cast a ballot for president for the first time in my life,” he said.

Read the full statement if you’re not prone to violent allergic reactions to ridiculous rants of Evangelicalism™.

I’ll admit that I had to look up the word “virulently” — it’s not one that I use regularly in my vocabulary. But seriously Mr. Dobson — a virulent, anti-family policy position? Come on. So that would mean affordable health care is anti-family; and keeping jobs here in the United States as opposed to shipping them off… so families can have food on the table. And what of the war in Iraq? Are we going to continue to sacrifice family members for a poorly-justified war, a war based on false pretenses?

No, James Dobson, last election, George W. Bush was the worst choice in our history for a president. Look at where his brilliant, “Christian” leadership has led us — into a multi-trillion dollar deficit, a war he once declared “Mission Accomplished”, a crisis with the housing and lending industry, an economy sliding towards a recession, a much higher unemployment rate, a weak dollar, and a failing school system. Oh and while we’re at it, much of the rest of the world is on pins and needles, not sure how to relate to us as a nation because our leader is a moron and doesn’t play well with the rest of the kids in the sandbox — always having to have his own way. No, James Dobson, the worst option for a president was George W. Bush, by far the most incompetent president I have seen in my lifetime.

In a way, this pertains to my journey towards Orthodoxy and away from Evangelicalism™ and protestantism in general. It’s his severe overreactions to the events in our culture and the political realm, that causes me to wonder about the substance of his faith. Is his job to make America an Evangelical nation or to serve Christ? I think the former.

James Dobson, stop sticking your thumb in the rest of the nation’s eyes — those who don’t think like you do. We don’t care what you think or what you have to say anymore. Your virulent theology is poisoning the minds of innocent believers throughout the United States. Make it stop.

Digg This
February 7, 2008, 12:45 pm

An amazing turnout for the DFL caucus in 39A

I’m keeping this brief, but it was remarkable to see the turnout for the DFL caucus in our senate district 39A. As we made our way down highway 52, the traffic was backed up a quarter mile on the highway alone… and was backed up all the way to Simley High School on 80th Street in Inver Grove Heights.

With hundreds and hundreds of cars, filling the parking lots, area streets, and still backed up to the highway, there was a remarkable feeling in the air — like people wanted to see change.

It will be interesting to see how the rest of the nation decides — Minnesota DFL’ers have spoken and Barack Obama is their man.

Digg This
February 5, 2008, 11:36 pm

Yes, we can… change American politics

Get out and vote at the primaries today. You don’t need to be registered to vote, it takes just five minutes of your time, and starts tonight at 6:30pm. Minnesota residents, to find your caucus location, visit caucusfinder.sos.state.mn.us.

Digg This
February 5, 2008, 9:07 am

George W. Bush: the new Nostradamus

So I just happened to glance up at this link in Gmail:

CNN.com Recently Published/Updated - Bush predicts Mideast peace pact by 2009

This would be the SAME Bush who declared “Mission: accomplished” years ago. My prediction? The Middle East will not see peace (let alone a pact towards peace) as long as you have people of such widely diverse world views and packed together in such a compacted region. If various sects of Muslims can’t even live amongst each other without killing one another, how can we expect peace between the Hindus, the Israelis, and the Muslims in Middle East?

I just don’t see it happening. And for Bush to be toting empty predictions at the end of his term, he’s just blowing smoke up our asses and wasting hot air on an audience that won’t believe him, let alone listening at all.

Digg This
January 10, 2008, 10:33 am

Evangelical heresy alive and well in American politics

I was having a good morning until I saw this video on Dr. Q’s Ramblings. I think the bottom of my jaw suffered a few minor contusions from dropping onto my desk.

Suddenly you need to be Republican to be in right standing with God.

Digg This
September 26, 2007, 7:48 am

Sicko

This evening my wife and I went to go see Michael Moore’s latest stroke of genious—SICKO, a massive exposé on the health “care” industry. I know Michael Moore has quite the reputation, particularly from the Republican party side of things, but this film is perhaps one of the most important films of this decade. I can say that because of one single statement that was made in this film: you can tell the true nature of a country by how they care for the least of its citizens.

Example after example and case by case, Moore dismantled the paranoia that’s been stirred up by the media, by health care lobbyists, and by political officials—the paranoia that so-called socialized medicine doesn’t work. Of course Canada becomes the glowing example of limited coverage, waiting for care, and people dying because of having to wait for essential services. But with great ease and case after case after case, the citizens of Canada speak out for themselves to the quality of their care and the worry-free life they have.

Moore examined the health care system here (in all its absurdity) and compared it to the likes of Canada, the UK, France, and even Cuba. Even in Cuba, the poorest of the poor have access to the most basic of services. In America, for example, an inhaler cost one woman over a hundred dollars. That very same inhaler in Cuba—same brand, same dosage, same ingredients—cost the equivalent of five cents.

In the UK, where they practice a national medical coverage, ALL medicines cost the same. So whether you need an antibiotic or some serious drugs to treat your cancer, you pay roughly £6 for all medicines. Your hospital visits and doctor visits…all free and completely covered regardless of who you are and what your condition. And if you had to pay a cab fare to get to the hospital—get this, the cab fare is REIMBURSED to you. The hospital actually PAYS you for your transportation costs to get there if you came on your own.

But what infuriated me the most in this film was how they treated workers from Ground Zero—volunteers who came from all around the area to help in the rescue efforts. If you weren’t on the city’s payroll as a CITY employee and passed the dozen or so strict terms and conditions, you were denied ANY portion of the $50 million that was allocated in funds for the rescue workers from that terrible time in our history.

Moore followed the stories of some of those workers that were denied assistance (REPEATEDLY) and listened to their horrid stories of being intentionally and willfully rejected by the city, state and federal government along with the health care industry—all because they didn’t meet an unreasonable set of standards.

Michael eventually brought them to Cuba, where they received quality exams, care, and a plan for recovery…for free. That care was the exact same care that they offer all off their citizens. Care that you would never find in America because the HMO’s are too busy lining their pockets with our health care premiums and convincing federal bureaucrats to drive fear into the hearts of its citizens, that our system is good enough—and that anything that smells of “socialist” medicine is of the devil.

One Canadian put it best [and I'm paraphrasing here because I don't have THAT good of a memory] when he said, “we’re just looking out for each other… if someone’s sick or hurting, you help them… and when we pay our taxes, we’re just doing our part to help each other out, helping others that have needs.”

My wife and I agreed wholeheartedly—the health care system in Canada is far more “Christ-like”, in that they actually care for the “least of these.”

I have to confess—if my wife or I had a great job offer in Canada, England, or even France, it would be hard to turn down with the kind of care and coverage one could find in such countries.

[Mental note to add the UK, France, and Canada to my Monster.com search perimeter.]

Digg This
July 26, 2007, 9:07 pm

Welcome to the world

I had a weird feeling just a moment ago that brought be back years ago.

Frustrated with the pressure of coming up with a logo for a client and the void of creativity that I was experiencing, I decided to surf Google for awhile and see what the competition was doing. That was uneventful, as it seems other job bank providers haven’t given much thought to branding, identity development, and the power of a logo. ‘Course it doesn’t help that the idea of a job bank doesn’t lend itself to a metaphor very easily—at least one that hasn’t been exhausted already.

Then I came across caljobs.ca.gov, and was greeted by the banner saying, “Welcome to California.” Of course I know that I physically haven’t arrived in California, but thinking about that just for a moment brought me back to when the internet was still quite new (to the general public).

I remember when web-based radio was a new thing and you could listen to radio stations on the other side of the planet; specifically I remember just how fascinating it was to hear through my computer what others were hearing then and there with their radios. The idea of connecting personally or virtually to another part of the world was such an incredible concept, I remember thinking that the possibilities would be so vast and virtually unlimited, save for the language barrier.

Now I think about how easy it is for people to access news and information about this and that, and how small our world has become. While it can be such a great thing, having access to such a wealth of information, it can be explosive.

I think about how crowded the world seems to be these days with the clash of ideas, civilizations, values, politics, and religion—and how the fuel for fighting one’s cause only seems to burn hotter with the ease of propagating an ideal. While I’d love to think humanity could rise above themselves and peacefully coexist despite our differences, I can’t help but to see only disaster.

I also think about how extremists have harnessed both the internet and the innocent to further their cause—cultivating a seething hatred for those that think differently, look differently, worship differently, and live differently. Bush calls them terrorists, but they’re all just different people that have extremely different values. The only difference is that some of those people use extreme measures of violence to defend their own perception of freedom.

But what is freedom for one person might be prison for another.

I think that some places in the world weren’t ready for the liberation of information through the internet. Bad news (however you define that) has a sort of encroaching, crowding sensation about it; and can have a number of effects on a person. Some might get stressed, others concerned, and some might protest or resist through demonstration. Some also use violence and force to push back the “aggressor’s” foreign ideas to preserve their own.

I know generalizing is bad and leaves too many gaping holes, but I think that the crisis in the middle east (though very complicated) seems to be only fueled by the West’s creeping ideals and values, thus bringing a clash between world views and the violent resistance we see from various factions.

I wish there were a better way to fix this mess—the conflict between people that think differently. But as long as people feel threatened in any way, there’s always going to be a violent response from those that don’t feel the freedom and safety to negotiate. I wish there could be an end to the cyclical violence.

Welcome to the world.

Digg This
March 9, 2007, 4:40 pm

A call for an apology from The Bush

I couldn’t have said it better myself.

Digg This
November 3, 2006, 2:36 pm

The tides are turning

It’s no secret that I’ve been angry with the current Administration and how terribly they’ve been running our fine nation.  I don’t really consider myself a democrat, but I’m also most certainly not a republican.  Thing is, I don’t really see myself as being libertarian or independent, so that leaves me somewhere in the middle, begging for the two majority parties to stop their nonsensical partisan crap-ass-battles and see things for what they are from the perspective of the people.  Unfortunately it seems our government seems to be overlooking the fundamental role of government: representation.  For the people, by the people.

But I’m not the only one.  Even a good friend of mine (who leans Republican), has reached an all new level of pissed off with the current ass-first administration.

As much as I don’t like all of the democrat standpoints, they sure beat the narrow-minded, blind-sighted republican party.  The democrats will also be getting my vote, too. 

Digg This
October 2, 2006, 10:22 am
« Previous Entries